I started two books on New Year’s Day, knowing that if the first failed me (it did not) the second, a perennial favourite, would still guarantee a wonderful beginning to the year. After more than a decade of reading and rereading, The Siren Years by Charles Ritchie has never once let me down and remains the finest book I’ve ever read about wartime London and one of my top five favourite books of all-time.
For those who missed being introduced to Ritchie a few months ago when I reviewed An Appetite for Life (it was also one of my favourite books of 2011), a few words: Charles Ritchie was a Canadian diplomat who, at the height of his professional career in the 1960s, served, among other postings, as Ambassador to the United States and as the Canadian High Commissioner to the UK. But more importantly, he was an unparalleled diarist.
I have read so many volumes of war time diaries over the years but this remains my favourite. While this collection begins during Ritchie’s time with the Canadian legation in Washington and ends in 1945 with him back in Ottawa (after an excursion in the spring to the San Francisco Conference that established the UN), the bulk of his entries deal with his time in London where he served as private secretary to Vincent Massey, the Canadian High Commissioner. Ritchie had such a magnificent prospect on the events of the day: at the High Commission, constantly dealing with refugees, Brits and ex-pats trying to flee to Canada for the duration; in conversation with various embassies and both foreign and British politicians; and in his dealings with his large and varied circle of friends, full of intellectuals and major literary figures.
I first read this book when I was twelve years old, giddily exploring my new school’s library and coming upon all sorts of treasures. I fell in love with it immediately and now, looking back, I can see how well it armed me to analyse much of my future reading. Then and now, I have always loved reading about the Second World War, particularly novels or memoirs that focused on life on the home front. But I was always bothered by books that portrayed a tirelessly optimistic Britain – the Britain of wartime propaganda and Churchill’s speeches – full of brave citizens sure of victory, conspicuously free of anyone who would dare to contemplate a successful Nazi invasion. And, after rereading Ritchie’s diaries, it’s clear where that scepticism came from:
My office is the door of escape from hell. Day after day the stream of people press in. Today, for example, some of the Austrian Rothschilds (escaped from a concentration camp) are trying to pass their medical examination to go to Canada. Would I arrange a financial guarantee for them? The wife of one of the wealthiest men in England is trying to get out of the country. Her husband is a Jew and a leading anti-Nazi. Will I get her a letter to prove (on very flimsy grounds) that she is a Canadian? Lady B, looking radiant, comes to ask if I would arrange for her son’s prep-school to be affiliated with a boys’ boarding school in Canada and to migrate there en masse. The Marchioness of C, in the uniform of the Women’s Naval Auxiliary Unit, wants to get three children out to Canada at once. Two Canadian journalists want to get their wives out but there is a mysterious delay in getting their exit permits. The Spanish Ambassador wants us to get accommodation for his daughter, his mother, and a troop of maids and governesses on board the next ship. They are going to Canada for a little rest from the nervous tension of the war. He knows he is slipping with his own government and may be in exile himself any day. The Polish Ambassador wants us to take the wives and daughters of one hundred high political and diplomatic dignitaries. Count X, the anti-fascist with a price on his head, must leave for Canada at once on a mission of great importance. I have only touched the edge of one day’s work. I do not mention my own friends and relatives who want to get out. Here we have a whole social system on the run, wave after wave after wave of refugees, and these are only the people at the top, people who can by titles, letters of introduction, or the ruling manner force their way into Government offices and oblige one to give them an interview. What of the massed misery that cannot escape?
The sense of the dissolution of civilized society is overpowering. (26 June 1940)
Ritchie and his political and diplomatic friends spend a lot of time contemplating various outcomes of the war, both before it begins and once it is in play. In conversation with Canadian, British, Australian, and Hungarian friends, the possibility of defeat is a very real option and everyone seems to have thought through how they think the terms of surrender should be structured. These are practical men, considering all possible outcomes, and a number of their proposals are quite plausible. After all, they are not military men, they are diplomats: they think in terms of negotiations, not battles. The idea of redrawing the map of Europe is exciting to them, a chance to correct the errors of the Treaty of Versailles, an opportunity to create real, lasting peace and forge strong, cooperative relationships between nations. Ritchie makes you see how exciting the possibilities were, even as destruction raged across Europe.
Mostly though, Ritchie is frustrated by the war, by the noncommittal yet interfering Canadian Prime Minister, the bane of everyone at Canada House (particularly Mike Pearson, judging by the biographies I’ve read), and by the terrifying ignorance of the British Foreign Office, who laughably propose to win favour with French-Canadians by forming close bonds with France (“I only hope to God that they know more about other foreign countries than they do about Canada”). He is bothered by the sentimental theatrics of Winston Churchill’s speeches (while acknowledging his oratorical style) and he loathes the aggressive vilification of the opposing forces that allows the Allies, with callous indifference, to ignore the devastation being brought down by their bombers on major cities throughout Europe:
Talked with George Ignatieff [also with the High Commission] today about this ghastly raid on Sofia where we have wiped out the whole centre of a town, which has no shelters, is built of wood, and is inhabited by people most of whom seem to be pro-Ally. The horror of these destructive attacks on the cities of Europe! It is such a revolting way of waging warfare and no one seems to try and realise what we are doing. It may be necessary, but at least we should accept the guilt and not send out brave, callow youths as our scapegoats to bomb in our names while we treat the news like a cricket score. (19 January 1944)
Though I am (clearly) fascinated by the political, Ritchie’s diaries are primarily focused on his personal life: his friendships, his day-to-day engagements and, of course, his affairs. Though humble in appearance, Ritchie was an incorrigible and wildly successful Lothario. He begins in London with an irritating, snobbish American ballerina (whose absences he characteristically looks forward to as a chance to stray) but in the spring of 1941 he meets Elizabeth Bowen. So begins the great friendship and love affair that would last until Bowen’s death in the early 1970s. She becomes a fixture in his diaries, with frequent mentions of their conversations, parties with her friends, and her work on the novel she would dedicate to Ritchie, The Heat of the Day. Ritchie, enthralled by her, is at his most poetic:
Of what is her magic made? What is the spell that she has cast on me? At first I was wary of her – ‘méfiant’ – I feared that I should expose my small shifts and stratagems to her eye which misses nothing. Her uncanny intuitions, her flashes of insight like summer lightening at once fascinated and disturbed me. Now day by day I have been discovering more and more of her generous nature, her wit and funniness, the stammering flow of her enthralling talk, the idiosyncrasies, vagaries of her temperament. I now know that this attachment is nothing transient but will bind me as long as I live. (2 June 1942)
Ritchie’s social life is a bit of a marvel. Bowen introduces him to a few of her literary friends but even before meeting her he is surrounded by authors, socialites, intellectuals, and aristocrats. His life is a dizzying array of busy nightclubs, dinners out and house parties in the country. There are lunches with Nancy Mitford, Christmases with the Sacheverell Sitwells, and on-going friendships with misplaced Central European royals. How he picked up most of these people I have no idea but he seems to have known most of them before taking up his work at Canada House. As a sophisticated, intelligent, witty man, I have no doubt that he was an entertaining guest:
I suffer less than usual during this party as a result of consuming one glass of champagne after another in quick succession. I realized that this was necessary when somebody came up to me and said ‘You look like Banquo’s ghost’. After that I felt I must go home immediately or get tight. I am glad I chose the latter course. (12 Jul 1938 – Washington)
Yet even Ritchie the sophisticated bachelor could get tired of his hectic life, though knowing how he loves his mistresses one can hardly take his wishes for domestic bliss too seriously:
I am sick of my present hectic life – the work, the miscellaneous loveless affairs, and the mixed drinks. I wish I lived in a small provincial town and spent the evenings reading aloud the Victorian novelists to my wife and adoring daughters. (29 March 1941)
Though Ritchie does not include a lot of specific details on daily domestic life (not in the way that Mass Observation diaries do, for instance), focusing instead on his work and social engagements, some fascinating glimpses do slip in. For instance, he marvels at being able to walk through all the garden squares in London, now without the foreboding gates that kept them private for so long, and records how, after his flat is hit during the Blitz, he finds himself living in first a hotel and then one of his clubs with only one suit and one pair of shoes. “The Depart of External Affairs will never approve replacing suits from Sackville Street at twenty pounds per suit,” he sadly reflects.
I had also never realised how frequently Ritchie refers to his personal reading: seeking refuge in “the warmly-coloured, variegated women’s world of Colette” during the Blitz, longing for Halifax after reading Hugh MacLennan’s Barometer Rising, rejoicing in Shakespeare, thrilling to the romance of Joseph Bédier’s Tristan et Iseult…the list goes on, including countless titles and authors I have never heard of. It is always comforting to feel that one is in the company of an appreciative reader, as though that similarity alone suddenly makes him more trustworthy (but doesn’t it?).
This review is rapidly growing out of control, but indulge me one last nostalgic ramble. I am endlessly fascinated by the stories of Canada House during the war and this is the book that launched my interest. Wartime London in general interests me but, as a Canadian, it is amazing to me to think of Mike Pearson, Charles Ritchie and George Ignatieff, all major post-war political and diplomatic figures, working together under Massey, developing their ideas of what Canada should be alongside one another. All three were Oxford educated and comfortable (particularly in Ritchie) in English society but they all developed into passionate Canadians who dedicated their lives to serving Canada, believing in its promise and their shared vision for its future. Throughout my teens, they were my heroes, both for their strong sense of duty and their inspiring idealism.
As I said (many, many paragraphs ago in the introduction), The Siren Years remains the finest book I’ve ever read about wartime London. It is more comprehensive and more stylishly written than anything else on offer, with the beguiling, sophisticated Ritchie at its heart.
Read Full Post »