Five years ago in the late and lamented Slightly Foxed bookshop in Gloucester Road, I picked up Rosabelle Shaw by D.E. Stevenson (alongside a handful of other books). I’d discovered D.E.S. a few years before but had never heard of this title. I assumed it was obscure for good reason (already recognizing the varied quality of D.E.S.’s output) but for a meager £4 wanted to find out for myself. So home it came with me only to languish for five years unread until I picked it up this August when I was home sick with a cold.
Unusually for D.E.S., this is a historical piece. Opening in Edinburgh in the 1890s, we meet vivacious young Fanny who has caught the eye of the steady, determined farmer John Shaw. The two are soon wed and Fanny finds herself living on John’s well-managed farm in East Lothian, unsure how to handle both rural life and marriage. So far familiar stuff for fans of D.E.S. Fanny is sweet and charming and finds a friend in the old local doctor and amusing – but useful – guidance in an old book. The marriage is off to happy start and a daughter, Rosabelle, arrives followed a few years later by a son.
But the Shaw’s calm family life is disrupted by the arrival of a young boy, the only survivor of a mysterious shipwreck. Saved by John Shaw, Fanny takes the orphaned child into her home and it is not long before the two are closely bonded. Jay, the boy, grows into a jealous, calculating child and Fanny’s championing of him causes an understandable rift with John. Her own children try to accept Jay as a sibling and playmate but his moody, brooding ways make it difficult.
The book then jumps forward to the eve of WWI. Jay, uncharacteristically affable and forging a strong bond with his adopted father, is as dangerous as ever – especially to Rosabelle, who finds herself deeply attracted to him despite knowing how untrustworthy he is. Meanwhile, her neighbour Tom watches with concern…
D.E.S. is hardly a known for her consistency but this is an unusually uneven novel, with abrupt mood changes and an embarrassingly loose plot with far too many cardboard characters. And yet, that said, it was the perfect undemanding read for my sick day. I loved the end of the book, with Rosabelle forging a friendly and loving partnership with Tom, having married him to provide a barrier from the alluring Jay but truly coming to love him. It is the exact opposite of the highly dramatic scenes with Jay and far more in keeping with D.E.S.’s usual style, which she was still developing in 1937 when this was first published. She’d only written a handful of books then and hadn’t yet settled into the light romances she would do so capably for the next three decades. She still had a bit of melodrama left to get out of her system – Rochester’s Wife was published in 1940 – but it’s clear her lighter side was trying to break through while writing this. The result is messy but a very interesting read for any D.E.S. fan.
I have this book too and have yet to read it.I bought it in a job lot of DES.I hope i get round to it but it is not one of her best.
To her credit, this is definitely not Stevenson’s worst book – not by a long short. It’s just uneven but intriguingly so.
I too like those understanding books. So necessary on some days
Agreed!
I thought sounded familiar and according to Good Reads I have read. Yes, it is uneven in scope. It actually reminds me Wuthering Heights.
Yes, there is a bit of gothic that slips through – and which D.E.S. really doesn’t know how to handle.
I don’t have this one. (Yet.) Nice to have to look forward,to, uneven or not! Thank you for the write-up. 🙂
Even a not-so-good D.E.S. is still something to look forward to!