When I picked up The Diaries of Sylvia Townsend Warner edited by Claire Harman I was looking forward to being reunited with an old, dear friend. My acquaintance with Sylvia Townsend Warner (STW) goes back to 2012, when on Simon’s flawless recommendation I read The Element of Lavishness, a collection of letters between her and William Maxwell. It remains one of my favourite books and encouraged me a few years later to pick up a collection of her letters (this time edited by Maxwell) that was almost equally delightful. Through these letters I met a woman who was whimsical but dangerously observant, loving yet reserved, and ferociously intelligent. I loved her for all these traits and looked forward to getting to know her even better through her diaries.
Turns out, that was not to be. Some people are born diarists (Harold Nicolson and Charles Ritchie, for example, neither of whom I can ever praise too highly). Others are not, perhaps because they have so many other outlets for expression. STW, it turns out, was not a master diarist and saved the best of her writing and insights for her letters and books. This is still a worthwhile book for any STW fans but it by no means gives as complete a picture of the woman, her interests, and her enchanting thoughts as do her letters.
Running from 1927 to 1978 (the year of her death), the diaries are sporadic and various periods her life remain undocumented. The earliest years are dry but, to me, offer some of the most fascinating entries, full of musical scholarship concerns and relative indifference to her long-running affair with Percy Carter Buck, the director of music at Harrow. She was in her early thirties, had already established herself as a successful author (with Lolly Willowes and Mr Fortune’s Maggot), and seems to have lived a pleasant and sociable life. It was interesting to see her mention several times a vague sense of sadness that she didn’t have children but she seems more concerned with a sense of continuation and legacy than any feeling of loss:
I wish I could be a grandmother. It is wanton extravagance to have had a youth with no one to tell of it to when one grows old (9 January 1928)
This period also included one of my favourite, very STW-esque entries:
We drank sherry in the nursery, while poor Bridget wailed on mother’s milk. Sherry in the nursery seemed to very Victorian, with a high fender and a smoky chimney and all, that it occurred to us that we must be the last of the Victorians. But later in the evening at the Chetwynd’s party I met a purer specimen…the little Countess of Seafield, so like Victoria that as I sat by her on the sofa I felt myself growing more and more like Lord Melbourne. (24 November 1928)
(This, for the record, is exactly what her letters sound like. Please go read her letters.)
In 1930, however, the whirlwind begins: she begins a relationship with Valentine Ackland that will continue (with many, many bumps along the way) until Ackland’s death in 1969. It was the consuming passion of STW’s life but it’s impossible to view Ackland benignly given how much pain she caused the ever-loyal STW. Still, it began well:
Just as I blew out the candle the wind began to rise. I thought I heard her speak, and listened, and at last she said through the door that this would frighten them up at the Vicarage. How the Vicarage led to love I have forgotten (oh, it was an eiderdown). I said, sitting on my side of the wall, that love was easier than liking, so I should specialise in that. ‘I think I am utterly loveless.’ The forsaken grave wail of her voice smote me, and had me up, and through the door, and at her bedside. There I stayed, till I got into her bed, and found love there… (11 October 1930)
The bulk of the diaries focus on Ackland. Like many people, STW seems to have been most devoted to her diary when she was the most troubled and that trouble was invariably caused by Ackland’s infidelities, particularly her long relationship with fellow poet Elizabeth Wade White. It’s excruciating to read her pain at these times, when the woman she was so devoted to was casting her aside:
I kissed the hollow of her elbow – gentle now under may lips, and no stir beneath the skin. She looks as beautiful now as when she was beautiful with her love for me. (15 August 1949)
But it is worse when Ackland dies. After long years of illness, Ackland’s passing leaves STW bereft and, for the first time in almost forty years, truly alone. I remember finding her letters to Maxwell from this period excruciatingly painful and the diary entries are equally so, showing how much her days were consumed with thoughts of her lost love. But this is also when she begins to record her thoughts on aging, which she excels at:
In my bath, looking at my arm, remembering how often she kissed it, I bethought me that I inhabit my body like a grumbling caretaker in a forsaken house. Fine goings-on here in the old days: such scampers up and down stairs, such singing and dancing. All over now: and the mortality of my body suddenly pierced my heart. (18 September 1970)
Though the book is, primarily, an account of her time with Ackland (and an especially detailed chronicle of the difficult periods in their relationship), there was still enough of the minutiae of daily life to entertain me. I was touched by her account of picking up Between the Acts shortly after Virginia Woolf’s death:
At Boots Library the young woman put into my hands Virginia Woolf’s last book. And I received an extraordinary impression how light it was, how small, and frail. As though it was the premature-born child, and motherless, and literally, the last light handful remaining of that tall and abundant woman. The feeling has haunted me all day. (26 January 1942)
And I loved her delight at receiving a positive review from an Italian newspaper:
In the morning I received a cutting from La Gazettino – a Venetian paper – sent by Aldo Camerino who had written an extremely praising and glorifying and gratifying account of Winter in the Air, and me in general. It is wonderful to begin a day by reading of oneself as La Townsend Warner. Such things occur but seldom, and I have been enjoying a compass of over two octaves, a flawless legato, complete control of all fioriture passages, great dramatic intensity and a commanding stage presence all day. (18 January 1956)
Moments like this are why I love STW. It seems she saved most of them for her letters but there were still enough in these diaries to provide real enjoyment. I can’t say the diaries helped me to know her any better but they were moderately fascinating, enough that I am happy to have read them. And I did discover one very interesting thing: that she is exactly the same person in her letters as she is in her diaries. It takes a special kind of confidence and courage to be fully yourself in correspondence and I’m delighted to have discovered this about her.
This is fascinating because the only work I have read is her diearies, which I picked up in a charity shop some years ago and I have never felt the need to read anything else. You encourage me to reverse that view and I will definitely look out the letters at least. Thank you.
Wonderful! I am certain you will enjoy the letters more than this.
I completely agree, and not just because you called my recommendation flawless. The Between The Acts moment really stayed with me, but the rest was useful for dphil rather than brilliant. Her letters are incomparably more wonderful, as you say.
Yes, I’ve had this on my shelves for a few years but won’t feel the need to keep it any longer now that it’s read. Not when that space could be used for her letters!
Yes, that is so very poignant. I have had much the same feeling at Monk’s House or in the garden there. I have a favor to ask. It seems that Between the Acts was published in July, 1941. Could you please check the date of the Diary entry? Many thanks.
Sorry, that was a typo. It is of course an entry from 1942, not ’41. Thanks for catching that!
I’m never sure about diaries, they are so personal, often never meant for publication, at least not when first begun. I have even been bored in the past by diaries of people who in themselves are fascinating. The one diary I loved was Virginia Woolf’s writers diary which is heavily edited. I love Sylvia Townsend Warner so much, so I am definitely going to put this and the letters on my wish list. Her writing is gorgeous.
I can understand that. However, I think STW was aware, certainly by the end of her life, that there would be an interest in her papers. And in her case, with no children or grandchildren for her to have shared her stories with, it is her only method of creating a personal and not just literary legacy.
I bought this because I love STW’s novels and short stories(and I can’t resist old Viragos), but now I’m wishing I had her letters.
Well sounds like you’ll just have to buy more books then! Hardship after hardship 😉
Truly, I think the letters (both the collection edited by William Maxwell and The Element of Lavishness) are extraordinary and consider both volumes among my all-time favourite books.
I love STW’s diaries. I bought them in hard cover in 1994 and have reread them multiple times. That being said, I understand why you feel they lack the immediacy of her letters. Partly, I think, this is to do with editorial selection by Claire Harman. If you read her foreword to the Diaries, she says (I am at work so don’t have my copy to hand, so apologies if I paraphrase) that she has omitted many entries about STW’s daily life, the ‘antics of her cats’, stories of family, friends and neighbours – in short much of the dailyness that is the material for STW’s letters. Instead Harman focuses on Ackland, STW’s writing and politics – all interesting but these are the serious aspects of her life which tend to offer far less scope for the joie de vivre and sparkle that emerge from her letters. I wish STW had a larger following which would justify the publication of at least another volume with a different selection of material which would, I suspect, win STW even more fans.
An excellent point re Harman’s editing choices. I completely agree that another volume with a different focus would help win STW more adoring fans.