In the way of many of P.G. Wodehouse’s novels, Mike and Psmith has a complicated history. In 1909, Wodehouse published a lengthy (some people *ahem* might call it overly long) novel entitled Mike. The first half detailed Mike Jackson’s entirely dull experiences as a school boy; the second half introduced the extraordinary Psmith, who made Mike’s remaining school days decidedly less dull. Wodehouse reissued the second half (with a few changes) as Enter Psmith in the 1930s. In 1953, the two parts of Mike were rewritten and reissued as Mike at Wrykyn and Mike and Psmith. For those of us who, though fond of Comrade Jackson, have no interest in his solo adventures, Mike and Psmith is an ideal distillation of the story begun back in 1909.
When his father pulls Mike out of Wrykyn after too many poor reports from his teachers, Mike is aghast. His dreams of captaining the cricket team have been shattered and it is with a heavy heart that he sets out for his new school, Sedleigh, determined to dislike it and to never play for its inferior cricket team. Almost as soon as he arrives, he meets the school’s other new arrival: the exiled Etonian, Rupert Psmith, who, as he tells Mike, has just decided that morning to distinguish his patronym with the addition of a silent P. Even as a youth, Psmith is deeply interested in those around him and within moments is attempting to discern Mike’s allotted role in the school:
“Are you the Bully, the Pride of the School, or the Boy who is Led Astray and takes to Drink in Chapter Sixteen?”
“The last, for choice,” said Mike, “but I’ve only just arrived, so I don’t know.”
The teenaged Psmith is already as elegant and composed as a statesman, comfortable leaning against the mantelpiece and admiring newcomers through his monocle. Already he is “…one of those people who lend dignity to everything they touch.” Within a few hours of his arrival, he has seized Mike as his boon companion, commandeered a study, and set up a retreat that sounds exceeding comfortable. He is much at home by the time the other students realise what has happened. Once they appear, Psmith is only too happy to host them:
“We are having a little tea,” said Psmith, “to restore our tissues after our journey. Come in and join us. We keep open house, we Psmiths. Let me introduce you to Comrade Jackson. A stout fellow. Homely in appearance, perhaps, but one of us. I am Psmith. Your own name will doubtless come up in the course of general chit-chat over the tea-cups.”
Mike is rather swept along by the brilliance of Psmith, as Psmith thwarts pranksters, allies with influential school figures, and determines the best way to keep both himself and Mike from having to play school cricket. Mike, a cricket addict, sneaks off and plays for the village team; Psmith feels no such desire, though he is happy enough to watch. As he so beautifully puts it: “Cricket I dislike but watching cricket is one of the finest of Britain’s manly sports.”
Psmith’s method of escaping school cricket is to sign up for the school’s archaeological club, run by his and Mike’s housemaster. Psmith is capable of cultivating an interest in anything and so it is with archaeology. Rather like a royal prince bound by duty to pretend an interest in the quaint hobbies of the peasants, Psmith throws himself into the club:
…Psmith followed his leader with the pleased and indulgent air of a father whose infant son is showing him round the garden. Psmith’s archaeological research struck a new note in the history of that neglected science. He was amiable, but patronizing. He patronized fossils, and he patronized ruins. If he had been confronted with the Great Pyramid, he would have patronized that.
I have just realised that my fondness for Tony Morland owes no smart part to his similarities with Psmith; namely, their amazing sangfroid, their passionate interest in other people and things, and their extraordinary gift for condescending to others. Fascinating.
Unfortunately, the book does rather revolve around cricket, which I have always found far too tedious to learn the rules of. All I know of cricket has been learned through the pages of P.G. Wodehouse and A.A. Milne books and, as far as I am concerned, I know far too much. By the end of the book, both Mike and Psmith have proved themselves heroes on the cricket pitch. Before that can happen though, there are a few awkward moments when, with the school leaders hot on Mike’s trail after a misdeed, Psmith must do his best to confound their efforts. Of course, being Psmith, he does this by talking circles – of sense and nonsense – around everyone. Unsurprisingly, the headmaster finds it all a little bewildering:
The headmaster seemed to have some difficulty in proceeding. He paused again. Then he went on.
“Er – Smith, I do not for a moment wish to pain you, but have you – er, do you remember ever having had, as a child, let us say, any – er – severe illness? Any – er – mental illness?”
“No, sir.”
“There is no – forgive me if I am touching on a sad subject – there is no – none of your near relatives have ever suffered in the way I – er – have described?”
“There isn’t a lunatic on the list, sir,” said Psmith cheerfully.
For me, these exchanges are so far preferable to Wodehouse’s descriptions of incomprehensible sporting achievements. This is what Psmith does best (as can be seen in those other fine novels Psmith in the City, Psmith, Journalist, and Leave it to Psmith) and it is why he will always be my choice for fictional character I would most like to have with me in a troubling situation. Or, frankly, any situation. You can keep Uncle Fred and Gally, Jeeves and Lord Emsworth. To me, Psmith will always be Wodehouse’s greatest and most charming creation.
Oh what a lovely tribute. I have yet to meet Psmith – I’ve only read about Jeeves so far – but this wonderful review makes me want to pick up the book immediately. I don’t know how I feel about reading about cricket for whole chapters but I do often read about sports in the school stories books I like. The Trebizon novels have the main character take an interest in tennis and I did learn quite a bit.
Interesting parallel drawn with Tony Morland- I’ve only read High Rising and Wild Strawberries but, as I understand, Thirkell dedicated whole books to the character. He’s certainly unforgettable and one of the highlights of High Rising!
It sounds just lovely – I am equally ignorant of cricket, but I think the character of Psmith alone would make these worth reading!
I must confess to gaining most of my own personal knowledge of cricket (very meagre!) via Lord Peter Wimsey’s exploits on the pitch (is that correct?) in Murder Must Advertise. P.G. Wodehouse has been most helpful on educating me regarding the finer points of golf, though, another gentlemanly (gentlepersonly?) occupation which is (so far) foreign to me in actual practice.
I did meet Psmith once upon a time in the long ago; your review makes me keen to renew acquaintance. 🙂
I’m looking forward to the Psmith books. I’ve only read Jeeves and some of the Blandings thus far. You do such good summaries that even the fact that I’m ignorant about cricket won’t deter me. 🙂
I read a lot of Wodehouse when I was at College but even then Psmith was not one of the characters with whom I spent any time. I’ve been thinking for a while that I should of back to the great Plum. While I enjoyed his humour as a teenager I think I would appreciate his style now. Perhaps I might try Psmtih rather than going over those novels I’ve already read.
Just what I was thinking, Leaves & Pages. Wimsey of Balliol blowing his cover as Death Bredon by performing brilliantly at the company match.
I adore Psmith. Met him many many years ago in Leave it to Psmith, where, as one of the endless legion of imposters who infiltrate Blandings Castle, he impersonates poet Ralston McTodd, the Saskatoon Songbird, unaware that the woman he has fallen in love with is the absent poet’s wife’s best friend. (Got that?)
Oh, your post made me so happy! I read all the Psmith books last year and was completely in love with him as a character (although as one of those characters that I very much doubt I would like in real life!). ‘Psmith, Journalist’ is one of my all-time favorite Wodehouse books (as is ‘Leave It To Psmith’). That book had me in tears from laughing so hard.
Quite ironic, though, that I didn’t actually read ‘Mike & Psmith’ – the library didn’t have a copy and I had trouble locating an inexpensive copy. Dad found one for me several months after I finished the rest of the Psmith books – I’ll definitely have to move it up the priority list! 🙂
I think I’ll be reading this again myself before too long! I had no idea of the complicated history of Mike & Psmith! Though PGW’s non-Jeeves books can be hard to find. I once left a copy of Mike at Wrykyn on the shelf at a bookstore. As much as I enjoyed this one, I didn’t feel that Mike without Psmith would have the same appeal – and you’ve confirmed that for me. I do love Psmith, but I don’t feel quite the same connection to Tony Morland.
YES. BETTER THAN JEEVES. (I already knew that you and I agree on this point, but I am still happy to have it reinforced once more.) I have to reread the Psmith books one of these days — it’s been a while!
_Leave is to Psmith_ is my favorite Wodehouse. Jeeves is wonderful, but Psmith is brilliant.
Lovely review, and great start to ACOB2014! I’ve only read Psmith Journalist from the Psmith list, and love him of course – and I love that last excerpt you quote especially. But the cricket might put me off for the moment… like you, AAM has taught me all I know, and it’s more than I would wish.
“Leave it to Psmith” is also my favourite Wodehouse book. “Mike and Psmith” is more of a curiosity. I am a big cricket fan (being an Australian) and I did not mind the cricket bits, but even for me they tended to be a bit long.
I am going to read all about Psmith, thanks to you!
[…] Mike and Psmith (1953) – P.G Wodehouse I chose to start 2014 off in style, with the story in which P.G. […]