When I finished reading the last diary entry in Storm Signals by Charles Ritchie, I was reluctant to put the book down. I have been a fan of Ritchie’s diaries since I was twelve years old and first discovered them on the shelf of my school library. I always enjoy any time I spend reading his books and never tire of rereading them. It is impossible not to grow attached to a diarist when you’ve followed him over the course of almost fifty years. He is wonderfully familiar to me; I know him as a reckless, enthusiastic youth, a sophisticated, heartless bachelor about town, an eager new ambassador, and a middle-aged veteran who is granted the very best postings. When I come to the end of the diaries, it is always difficult to say goodbye.
Since last autumn, I’ve reread all four volumes of Ritchie’s diaries in chronological order. I started with An Appetite for Life, covering Ritchie’s late teens in Canada and England, moved on to The Siren Years, a record of Ritchie’s wartime experiences in London and easily one of my favourite books, and enjoyed Diplomatic Passport, chronicling Ritchie’s first years as a diplomatic representative (as opposed to staff member) in post-war Europe and America. The final volume, Storm Signals, is a selection of Ritchie’s diaries between 1962 and 1971, during which time he served as Canadian ambassador to the United States before moving on to his final diplomatic posting, as Canadian High Commissioner in London.
As usual, the focus of the diaries is more personal than professional. A reader looking for specific details about the business of the day would be disappointed. Ritchie records his impressions and opinions without ever dwelling on anything that could be considered sensitive information. For the general reader, this is more than enough detail. We learn what he thought of Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, of the political crises of the day, and of the tensions between the Canadian and American governments at the time that created a rather stressful working environment for Ritchie in Washington. Both presidents kept their distance from Ritchie because of disagreements between the two nations about major issues like nuclear weapons, economic sanctions for communist nations, and the war in Vietnam.
These tensions did keep Ritchie busy during his US posting but he still had plenty of time to keep his diary, thankfully. One of the delights of Storm Signals is that he takes this time to look back on his life and ponder the strange workings of fate. Finally, the reader gets to learn a little of how Ritchie spent the undocumented decade between the end of An Appetite for Life and the start of The Siren Years. He was briefly – and unsuccessfully – a schoolmaster and then in the early 1930s, with few other options available, applied for a fellowship at Harvard (where he had studied for a year after leaving Oxford) that would, as he says, ‘prove a turning point’:
There were two fellowships on offer: one to proceed to France to explore the significance of the word ‘sensibilité’ in eighteenth-century French literature, the other to advanced studies in the origins of the First World War. I coveted the first and obtained the second. It was to prove a turning point, for had I been delving into ‘sensibilité’ in the cafés of Montpellier I should not have been in Boston to take the examination for the Department of External Affairs and ergo I should not now, as an aging Ambassador, be sitting at my desk in Washington wasting the government’s time with this excursion into the past when I should be studying the statistics of Canadian lumber exports. (8 July 1963)
I would just like to say how enjoyable I think either subject would be, though I can easily understand how in 1931 he was more drawn to the idea of studying in Paris than in going back to Cambridge.
After Washington, the London posting was a dream. Ritchie got to return to a city he loved, to live in a gorgeous house, and to be near many of his oldest and closest friends. It was an undemanding, pleasurable appointment and Ritchie welcomed it:
I looked forward to it in a spirit best expressed by my friend Douglas LePan, who wrote, in congratulation, that my motto should be that of the Renaissance Pope – ‘God has given us the Papacy, now let us enjoy it.’
A large part of what makes Ritchie so irresistible to me is his tendency to spout rather romantic images. He could be, I think, a rather reserved man, as befits a career diplomat, and certainly his early affairs were more about physical pleasure than any kind of spiritual fulfilment, though he did find that in his thirty-year long relationship with Elizabeth Bowen and in his happy marriage to wife Sylvia. But his sentimentality does show up in his writing and I love when it does:
Voices and music from a next-door party sounding from behind the screen of heavy-leafed trees bordering the garden. The music plucks at some lost feeling. The women’s voices sound languorous and exciting. It is true, no doubt, that the encounters between people at that party are as forced as at the party I have just left, that most are looking beyond each other’s left ear to sight someone more important to talk to. The laughter in most cases does not contain in its volume one hundredth part of real laughter and is as tasteless as frozen ham, but perhaps it is worth coming to a garden setting under the glossy, unreal light of late evening if two people on the outskirts of the party remember it as the moment when they first met, and carry the memory that it was there that it all started. (30 June 1962)
I also loved this image (and could certainly relate to his wish):
When I woke this morning and saw sun on the melting snow I closed my eyes, pulled the eiderdown over my head, and wished that I lived by myself in an isolated autumnal château in France with high walls round it, with books, a fire in the library, the smell of leaf mould in the garden outside. (22 December 1962)
And, of course, there are Ritchie’s credentials as a reader. He is always reading, frequently something I have never heard of. His notes on reading remind me of Alberto Manguel, not because they read the same books (though there is some overlap) but there is something about the way both men approach reading and the way they both write about it that seems similar. How could I not be drawn to someone who says “I can’t go on reading Vanity Fair as I am bogged down among Amelia’s tender tears and rhapsodies and I will not skip to get back to Becky Sharp”? Or who finds Shakespeare’s plays so stirring that they hinder his recovery from illness: “I spent the afternoon recovering in bed. Read Antony and Cleopatra and became so moved and inflamed by it that I could not get to sleep at night.” Ritchie reacts to books like the best kind of reader.
Though Ritchie’s relationship with Elizabeth Bowen was intense and long-lived, it is rather nice to read about his appreciation of his wife Sylvia in these entries. Though, it must be noted, he edited these diaries for publication himself and they are highly censored, holding back the most personal and potentially hurtful details about his affairs. Still, both his casual and more thoughtful comments about how much he loves Sylvia are very welcome. He seems to be almost surprised at his real affection for her and at how highly he values her company and misses her during her absences. Theirs was a pragmatic marriage but, at least from his viewpoint, a very successful one – quite surprising given Ritchie’s heartless promiscuity in his youth.
As I finished reading, knowing that I had come to the end of Ritchie’s elegant and entertaining diaries once more, I felt the same way as I always do when I finish this cycle: thankful for Ritchie’s gifts as a diarist but frustrated that he did not publish more.
I love diaries, especially those that stretch over several volumes and, as you say, allow you to feel that you know the person writing them. Normally I would read those of literary figures, but you’ve made these sound so interesting that I think I’m going to have to see if they are available in the UK. Thank you.
I am so excited to have interested you in these diaries, Alex, even though they might not be your usual type of reading! Ritchie does have lots of literary friends who show up in his diaries, especially in The Siren Years, and I was always delighted by mentions of lunches with Nancy Mitford or weekends with Sachie Sitwell. I know that e-book editions were recently made available so hopefully it shouldn’t be too hard to track these down!
I don’t think I’ve ever heard of Ritchie but his life – and diaries – sound fascinating. I’m putting An Appetite for Life on my reading wish list. Thanks for the recommendation!
Debbie, I am always excited to introduce other readers to Ritchie but especially other Canadian readers!