Written in 1913 (and published in 1914), Old Friends and New Fancies by Sybil G. Brinton is the original Jane Austen sequel, though not a particularly memorable one (but, really, are any of them? Though I know we all have high hopes for P.D. James’s Death Comes to Pemberley). From Bath to London to, of course, Pemberley, Brinton focuses on the love lives of Colonel Fitzwilliam, Kitty Bennet, and Georgiana Darcy, matching them all up with familiar minor characters from other novels (and, not content with just these six, also busies herself pairing off extraneous others in the background).
As happy as I usually am to encounter Austen characters in sequels, Brinton over populates her novel, including people from all six novels. While it is satisfying as a fan to encounter all of these well-remembered characters again, it is also distracting, making it difficult for the reader to ever grow fond of one hero or heroine. And while some of Brinton’s pairing are delightfully intriguing (a marriage between Tom Bertram and Isabella Thorpe is an enchanting idea, sadly played off out of the reader’s sight), and others blandly inoffensive (James Morland and a subdued, much improved Kitty Bennet), the central romance between William Price and Georgiana Darcy is absurd. He has goodness and good looks, yes, but really nothing else to offer, certainly no position or fortune. Frankly, I cannot imagine a world where either Darcy or Jane Austen would condone such a match.
Generally, the characterization was surprisingly loyal, particularly for the Bingleys. Brinton’s Elizabeth Darcy has none of the wit of Austen’s Elizabeth Bennet but I’ve come to expect that from most sequels. Our former heroes are almost entirely ignored or granted a few unmemorable remarks to prove they are still alive, except for Mr. Knightley who is apparently still energetically chiding Emma over her attempts at matchmaking. But there were some truly upsetting liberties taken with the character of Mary Crawford, robbing her of her energy and spark, leaving her as a virtuous but sad young woman, forced to put up with the advances of Sir Walter Elliot even though she has fallen in love with the (here) stupidly useless Colonel Fitzwilliam. I loved Mary as she was and this destruction of her spirits is unforgivable.
I was also frustrated by the scarcity of scenes with Kitty in them. We gets lots and lots of Georgiana (so much, people, so much) but Kitty, who appears charming and enthusiastic and generally quite winsome, is shafted into a corner with her naïve hopes and misguided dreams while Georgiana has a very trying romance awakening. If you’re going to steal Austen’s characters, why would you make them so dull and uninteresting and then centre the book around them? Why?
Despite my complaints, the book itself is actually not that bad (high praise indeed). Brinton obviously was trying to keep her writing style vaguely in line with Austen’s but no one before or since has ever written in quite the same eccentric style as Austen. Still, Brinton’s style of writing works, though she can be overlong. For the most part, the characters are as we know and love them and, even when they are not, most of the pleasure in these sequels comes from encountering familiar faces, regardless of how they may now behave. Certainly, if you’re looking for a sequel that offers a stunning volume of Austen characters, this is the one for you. Emma is the most under-represented book, with only the Knightleys appearing, but the other five all lend multiple characters. It’s fun, it’s silly but not too silly, and, if you’re the kind of person who reads Austen sequels, it’s a definite must-read if only because it is so thoroughly devoted to matching off every unmarried character Austen left behind.
The Captive Reader 
Well — I read this a few years ago and absolutely loved it — and I am in general a great disliker of Austen sequels. I thought it was charming, witty and extremely well written. You can see my ravings about it here if you are interested: http://harrietdevine.typepad.com/harriet_devines_blog/2008/05/old-friends-and.html. But it’s different opinions that make blogging so interesting!
As you say, it’s always interesting to see what different opinions readers have on the same book! I am glad you enjoyed it, even though I didn’t love it.
I mean to read this one, really do! But get discouraged with every other Austen sequel/prequel that soon turns into a disappointment. I look forward to the upcoming P.D. James, but fear it will become another Colleen McCullough (gulp!).
Okay, comparing James and McCullough is just insulting! I should hope the baroness would do better! But you’re definitely right in saying that most sequels/prequels prove disappointing, regardless of author. I keep trying them, hoping for the best, but usually only end up enjoying the ones that have the least to do with the original novels.
I haven’t actually tried “sequel” type books – I guess I’ve been too skeptical. That said, I actually really enjoy the Jane Austen mysteries (featuring Jane as the main character) that Stephanie Barron has written. She seems to have really captured the language, using actual Jane quotes from time to time, and gives you the sense that you are really following Jane’s life as she changes the scenes to reflect the various moves that Jane had to make in her adulthood. I highly recommend them if you’ve never tried one – but start with the first one.
I have tried the Barron mysteries but they weren’t for me. I like her writing style but I’m just not a big mystery fan!
I haven’t tried any of the sequels either, though a friend swears by a “completion” of Sanditon. i picked up “Jane Fairfax” by Joan Aiken at a library sale ages ago but still haven’t read it.
I have a completion of Sandition waiting on my shelves but, even though I’ve had it for years, I’m still a bit scared to crack it open.
I think it’s funny that the book actively seeks to match up all the remaining singles. Maybe Emma isn’t largely featured because the author has taken over the match-making to the extreme.
I am only rarely interested in Jane Austen sequels, etc. This is not one of those that sounds interesting to me.
Matchmaking does seem to be the main purpose of most Austen sequels, I’ve found. I suppose it’s natural enough to want happy endings for all the characters Austen left unattached!
(years behind the fair) I’ve just read this and agree with everything you say. Vastly over-populated character list of stars and B listers, atrocious liberties taken with the divine Mary Crawford, and a ridiculous mismatch between William Price and Georgiana Darcy. But otherwise it’s a very good hommage. I don’t read sequels so don’t know the form (other than T H White’s Death Comes to Pemberley, which isn’t in the same genre) but I quite enjoyed this one. Brinton did some excellent Austen ventriloquism (asseverations, anyone?) but she got lost trying to devise a novel of her own from Austen’s leavings.
Have there been any Austen sequels that you’ve liked better?
This has been the best I’ve read so far. Better than Death Comes to Pemberley or the Joan Aiken sequels (of which there are many).
Not really. I didn’t mind the Elizabeth Aston sequels (perhaps because they didn’t focus primarily on Austen main characters) but nor, years after reading them, do I really remember them. I’ve had much better luck with Austen retellings. I enjoyed Jane of Austin by Hillary Manton Lodge, a retelling of S&S, and adore (and never tire of recommending) Ayesha at Last, a P&P retelling by Uzma Jalaluddin.